What support my argument is of course purely anecdotal. Here is my story: I shot a video in 16:9 MJPEG and wanted to upload it to YouTube (which just started to support 16x9) I didn't upload it as-is because (1) even though it was only 2 min, it took 300Mb space and it would take forever to upload so I need to transcode it to something smaller, and (2) I need to trim the beginning and ending a little bit.
To perform this task, I have the following apps in mind
- Windows Movie Maker (WMM)
- Kino
WMM is pretty good for quick-and-dirty editing and transcode to WMV (let's face it. 99% of people whom I shared my family video with have computers that could play WMV. I can't say the same for other formats. BTW, another app I used frequently was Adobe Premiere Pro, mainly for building DVD from DV I shot. However, it didn't seem to recognize MJPEG.)
I was mistaken that WMM doesn't handle 16:9 (it does. Just pick 16:9 in the option window) so I googled for an open source solution and found that Kino was a popular one and was available as Ubuntu package. I have Ubuntu Feisty Fawn on my workstation and I was able to find Kino (0.92) in Synaptic package manager. However, when Synaptic actually tried downloading it, it wasn't available. I googled again and this particular version doesn't seem to be available from anywhere!
So I just give up on Kino. You Linux power users will of course think that I was lame because there are several options:
- package of newer version of Kino is available. I could have installed them and see if it is compatible with Feisty. If not, I could always upgrade to the latest Ubuntu.
- compile the source of 0.92. I actually tried this. When I configure, it couldn't even generate the Makefile properly because a library is missing (which Synaptic tells me I had installed already)
Will I still recommend Ubuntu to my friends? You bet! Provided they are not "non-guru semi-power user" who do things beyond basic web surfing/e-mail, i.e., in the same boat as mine!